<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Zuckerberg worth $1.5-billion &amp;#8212; or not</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:03:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Zuckerberg worth $1.5-billion &amp;#8212; or not</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/18/zuckerberg-worth-15-billion-or-not/#comment-2442548</link><description>Exactly -- in fact, I meant to mention Trump in the post.  He's a classic example of someone whose net worth is probably close to zero -- or maybe a few tens of millions at best -- but who is regularly referred to as a billionaire.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zuckerberg worth $1.5-billion &amp;#8212; or not</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/18/zuckerberg-worth-15-billion-or-not/#comment-2442427</link><description>Reminds me of the myths perpetuated by Forbes and others about Donald Trump's wealth. Even though he's regularly featured in rich lists as a billionaire, it's pretty clear from the evidence that his net worth is a tiny, tiny fraction of that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, unlike Mark Z, Trump actually seems to believe he's a billionaire, and depends on this myth for his TV career and income from having real estate developers use his name on their buildings. Good story here: &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/23/business/yourmoney/23trump.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1221839491-2STi0W6dWjHb1BV6ym7jNg&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/23/business/your...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bluelines</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:54:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zuckerberg worth $1.5-billion &amp;#8212; or not</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/18/zuckerberg-worth-15-billion-or-not/#comment-2439855</link><description>I agree. He should have sold that sucker while he had the chance. Now, with the current recession, he'll have to sit it out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TigerTom</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:26:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>