<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Zuckerberg is smarter than I thought</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:23:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Zuckerberg is smarter than I thought</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/08/zuckerberg-is-smarter-than-i-thought/#comment-30049</link><description>LOL - there's a post in the reversal, I think.  Is that coming?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hyndman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:23:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zuckerberg is smarter than I thought</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/08/zuckerberg-is-smarter-than-i-thought/#comment-29903</link><description>What's interesting to me is that this demonstrates what admittedly is a painfully obvious fact - you are strongest when you have lots of alternatives.  Hype and possible cash machine that FB is, Zuckerberg was in the driver's seat.  And when you are, old "rules" - which, after all, in financing are all about how much you get and how much I therefore don't get - go out the window.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hyndman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:53:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zuckerberg is smarter than I thought</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/08/zuckerberg-is-smarter-than-i-thought/#comment-29866</link><description>It's a good move for all concerned if the consensus is to swing big for the fences.  Taking enough off the table not to worry about liquidity leaves Zuckerberg ready to focus on the long haul.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BW</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Warfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:49:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>