<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:15:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-421293</link><description>Hey, I'm pleased.  I PAY Yahoo for their services that I receive, and I would have left if Microsoft took over.  Go-o-o-O-O YAHOO!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peterblaise</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-420627</link><description>Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doninaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:12:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-414061</link><description>Yahoo was definitely a huge strategic attempt on the part of Microsoft to gain valuable Internet media assets since apart from maybe their Start Page (&lt;a href="http://msn.com"&gt;msn.com&lt;/a&gt;), MSN Messenger, and Hotmail, Microsoft has struggled in gaining any traction on the Internet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, yes Yang did pass up a lucrative offer for its shareholders, and he's definitely going to see legal action from many shareholders.  But Yang can also use this as a turning point for the company and can maybe spin this in a way that makes him look like a hero - David and Goliath sort of thing - and rally his troops.  Unfortunately, I'm sure there are more than a few employees with equity in the company that now looks at Yang as the guy who screwed them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way, I think Yahoo is better of as a standalone company - it is innovative, a supporter of open Web standards, and has lucrative International Internet assets.  The last thing I would want to see is Microsoft acquiring them and then beginning the process of moving away from PHP and MySQL to ASP and SQL server. *shutters*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thusenth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:25:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-413634</link><description>I totally agree.  Yang and company where in no way helping share holders by declining on the day.  They were so lucky to get a deal in the first place, it is just mind boggling that they would not take it.   They need to get rid of Yang...I'm glad I don't have any Yahoo shares or I would be pulling my hair out!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wendy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 18:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412412</link><description>i think negotiating with Ballmer must be more like avoiding a wrecking ball. Yang did an impressive job standing up o Microsoft and this could really be a great turning point for Yahoo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">n8k99</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:15:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412367</link><description>I don't think Jerry is the best man for the job.  I don't think it's awful for either MSFT or YHOO longer term if this deal doesn't get done (personally, I think it's best for both), but whether Jerry should be the CEO is a VERY separate question than whether he should be fired for not taking the MSFT deal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rseidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:39:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412363</link><description>I'm not sure I agree, Steven -- I think acquiring Yahoo was a valid&lt;br&gt;move for Microsoft to make at this point, if only to get its media and&lt;br&gt;advertising assets. But I think Ballmer could definitely have handled&lt;br&gt;things better. Negotiating with him must be like negotiating with a&lt;br&gt;pit bull.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:38:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412347</link><description>I agree that scale has value, Robert -- so how come Yahoo and the&lt;br&gt;uber-smart Jerry Yang haven't been able to generate any value from all&lt;br&gt;that scale? Yahoo has had not just months but years and has little or&lt;br&gt;nothing to show for it in terms of added value. Time to let someone&lt;br&gt;else try.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412328</link><description>I think that the time has come as well for Ballmer to take a very long permanent vaction. The whole idea was stupid and irresponsible as was Jerry for not taking the offer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:20:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412323</link><description>Ah, long live the near-term view!  Which I suspect most of the shareholders will share.  But...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All you need to really ask yourself is these two questions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. What are the chances that Jerry Y. is smarter than you or me?&lt;br&gt;(100%)&lt;br&gt;2. What are the chances that Jerry Y.'s ego is bigger than Steve B's?&lt;br&gt;(0%)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You undervalue the value of scale, which is understandable with a near-term view/  But  Yahoo still has scale in spades.  It's like thinking NFL teams are overvalaued.  All sports franchises will only get *more* valuable because soon, sports will be the only thing people watch live (and are forced somewhat  to actually watch the  commercials) on TV.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Things with scale come with a premium.  And should.  This doesn't mean Yahoo won't go down to $23 at the open on Monday!  But I'm pretty sure unless they screw things up so badly that scale erodes, over the long-term, Jerry made the right call. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess the more fun question is who gets fired first? Jerry or Steve?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rseidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:18:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412283</link><description>I totally agree, David. Anyone who says Yahoo could be worth $37 as a&lt;br&gt;standalone company needs their head examined. Yahoo started off on the&lt;br&gt;road to fiduciary duty and crossed over into la-la land.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:49:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YHOO and MSFT: Jerry Yang should be fired</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/03/yhoo-and-msft-jerry-yang-should-be-fired/#comment-412267</link><description>I might go so far as to say that it might have been a violation of fiduciary duty to not take the MSFT offer, as the highest actual value that could be obtained for the company. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Valuation is always difficult, but it seems hard to argue that Yahoo's intrinsic value as an independent entity could be so far off from the valuation at MSFT's revised $33/sh final offer, especially when Yahoo had been trading in the low $20s/sh before the bid.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>