DISQUS

David · 1 year ago

I might go so far as to say that it might have been a violation of fiduciary duty to not take the MSFT offer, as the highest actual value that could be obtained for the company.

Valuation is always difficult, but it seems hard to argue that Yahoo's intrinsic value as an independent entity could be so far off from the valuation at MSFT's revised $33/sh final offer, especially when Yahoo had been trading in the low $20s/sh before the bid.

mathewi · 1 year ago

I totally agree, David. Anyone who says Yahoo could be worth $37 as a
standalone company needs their head examined. Yahoo started off on the
road to fiduciary duty and crossed over into la-la land.

Robert Seidman · 1 year ago

Ah, long live the near-term view! Which I suspect most of the shareholders will share. But...

All you need to really ask yourself is these two questions:

1. What are the chances that Jerry Y. is smarter than you or me?
(100%)
2. What are the chances that Jerry Y.'s ego is bigger than Steve B's?
(0%)

You undervalue the value of scale, which is understandable with a near-term view/ But Yahoo still has scale in spades. It's like thinking NFL teams are overvalaued. All sports franchises will only get *more* valuable because soon, sports will be the only thing people watch live (and are forced somewhat to actually watch the commercials) on TV.

Things with scale come with a premium. And should. This doesn't mean Yahoo won't go down to $23 at the open on Monday! But I'm pretty sure unless they screw things up so badly that scale erodes, over the long-term, Jerry made the right call.

I guess the more fun question is who gets fired first? Jerry or Steve?

mathewi · 1 year ago

I agree that scale has value, Robert -- so how come Yahoo and the
uber-smart Jerry Yang haven't been able to generate any value from all
that scale? Yahoo has had not just months but years and has little or
nothing to show for it in terms of added value. Time to let someone
else try.

Robert Seidman · 1 year ago

I don't think Jerry is the best man for the job. I don't think it's awful for either MSFT or YHOO longer term if this deal doesn't get done (personally, I think it's best for both), but whether Jerry should be the CEO is a VERY separate question than whether he should be fired for not taking the MSFT deal.

StevenHodson · 1 year ago

I think that the time has come as well for Ballmer to take a very long permanent vaction. The whole idea was stupid and irresponsible as was Jerry for not taking the offer.

mathewi · 1 year ago

I'm not sure I agree, Steven -- I think acquiring Yahoo was a valid
move for Microsoft to make at this point, if only to get its media and
advertising assets. But I think Ballmer could definitely have handled
things better. Negotiating with him must be like negotiating with a
pit bull.

n8k99 · 1 year ago

i think negotiating with Ballmer must be more like avoiding a wrecking ball. Yang did an impressive job standing up o Microsoft and this could really be a great turning point for Yahoo.

Wendy · 1 year ago

I totally agree. Yang and company where in no way helping share holders by declining on the day. They were so lucky to get a deal in the first place, it is just mind boggling that they would not take it. They need to get rid of Yang...I'm glad I don't have any Yahoo shares or I would be pulling my hair out!

Thusenth · 1 year ago

Yahoo was definitely a huge strategic attempt on the part of Microsoft to gain valuable Internet media assets since apart from maybe their Start Page (msn.com), MSN Messenger, and Hotmail, Microsoft has struggled in gaining any traction on the Internet.

That said, yes Yang did pass up a lucrative offer for its shareholders, and he's definitely going to see legal action from many shareholders. But Yang can also use this as a turning point for the company and can maybe spin this in a way that makes him look like a hero - David and Goliath sort of thing - and rally his troops. Unfortunately, I'm sure there are more than a few employees with equity in the company that now looks at Yang as the guy who screwed them.

Either way, I think Yahoo is better of as a standalone company - it is innovative, a supporter of open Web standards, and has lucrative International Internet assets. The last thing I would want to see is Microsoft acquiring them and then beginning the process of moving away from PHP and MySQL to ASP and SQL server. *shutters*

Doninaz · 1 year ago

Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered.

peterblaise · 1 year ago

Hey, I'm pleased. I PAY Yahoo for their services that I receive, and I would have left if Microsoft took over. Go-o-o-O-O YAHOO!