<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Yes, blogging can be a business</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:02:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yes, blogging can be a business</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/29/yes-blogging-can-be-a-business/#comment-1300143</link><description>Yes, I noticed that too, Eric.  Not having editors does keep costs low, but there's definitely an intangible cost in the form of inaccuracies and lost credibility.  The nice thing about the Web, though, is that even if you're wrong, you're not wrong for long  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:02:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yes, blogging can be a business</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/29/yes-blogging-can-be-a-business/#comment-1300141</link><description>Very interesting that Calacanis posits unedited blogging as a way to keep costs low. That makes sense, but one must consider that the writer(s) involved must have the chops and self-editing discipline to produce a publication worth reading!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>