<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Yes, Apple rules &amp;#8212; but&amp;#8230; ho hum</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:38:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yes, Apple rules &amp;#8212; but&amp;#8230; ho hum</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/10/yes-apple-rules-but-ho-hum/#comment-1291711</link><description>"Game, Set and Match...Mr. Ingram"...(polite applause). ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Stuart</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yes, Apple rules &amp;#8212; but&amp;#8230; ho hum</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/10/yes-apple-rules-but-ho-hum/#comment-1291709</link><description>I suppose that's a fair point, Stuart.  But why didn't they have any big news  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yes, Apple rules &amp;#8212; but&amp;#8230; ho hum</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/10/yes-apple-rules-but-ho-hum/#comment-1291705</link><description>You know what? I actually take a different view here. If they didn't have any big news, good on them not to spin some up. Yes, it's lousy that their big event was not loaded with apple-tastic hoop-dee-doo, but it's a rare company that will not succumb to the "BUT WE HAVE TO SAY SOMETHING" trap when faced with a media event in the offing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It shows maturity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- Stuart</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:08:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yes, Apple rules &amp;#8212; but&amp;#8230; ho hum</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/10/yes-apple-rules-but-ho-hum/#comment-1291707</link><description>Thanks for the comment, Elea.  Those are some good points.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yes, Apple rules &amp;#8212; but&amp;#8230; ho hum</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/10/yes-apple-rules-but-ho-hum/#comment-1291702</link><description>I thought I was the only one who felt a bit let down.  After all, we already knew that Macs with Intel chips were going to come out, and many suspected that a laptop was in the works as well.  I'm not too excited by the MacBook Pro.  Maybe if it was more affordable for the average consumer?  Also, was it really such a great marketing move to release a new IMac just months before?  I work as a computer sales employee at a college bookstore, and now we've got ten IMacs in stock that people are probably not going to want anymore, thanks to the Intel-based ones that just came out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elea</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:15:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>