<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Yahoo gets smart, kills Yahoo Photos</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/yahoo_gets_smart_kills_yahoo_photos/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:41:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yahoo gets smart, kills Yahoo Photos</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/yahoo-gets-smart-kills-yahoo-photos/#comment-1314092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And it only took 7 months post-pbm&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo gets smart, kills Yahoo Photos</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/yahoo-gets-smart-kills-yahoo-photos/#comment-1314093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Danny pretty much said the same things that I was thinking. It seems like Yahoo is screwing over a good chunk of its users (many more than the number of people using Flickr), just to bask in a TechMeme tongue-bath of hype. I don't think most of their users give the slightest crap about Flavor Of Teh Day 2.0.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And if Arrington was in a sitdown dinner and left to do some blogging, that's so annoying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 12:18:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>