<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Yahoo: Desperate for Web 2.0 traction&amp;#63;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/yahoo_desperate_for_web_20_traction63/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:48:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yahoo: Desperate for Web 2.0 traction&amp;#63;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/17/yahoo-desperate-for-web-20-traction/#comment-1315886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My thoughts exactly. $350m here, $300m there, pretty soon you're talking real money. Next comes the vision swiftly followed by the integration - a massive amount of Pepto dismal and then we're on to the next thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What are they thinking - Where's the explanation? Just what we need - more AJAX email viewers. When will the madness end?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cranstone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:48:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>