Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

mmm — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:26:49 -0000

I agree. I signed up for ymail, only to realize that the "y" looks very much like a "g" when typed or written. Many people take a quick glance at my ymail address and see it as gmail. I wonder how many of my emails have gone to whoever has the same username at gmail? I don't know why Yahoo did this.

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

Benny — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:27:57 -0000

People under 30 better start using email.

It is connected to many other things in general and in life!

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

Nirmal Natarajan — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:07:33 -0000

Do people under 30 not use email?
Probably you should educate your daughters not to be odd out of the bunch.

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

Kenneth Burchfiel — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:49:33 -0000

People under thirty don't care about e-mail? Are you kidding me? Electronic mail is my primary method of communication these days, specifically because it's not connected to any social networking fad.

If you disagree, you can always e-mail me at Sleet@ymail.com . :-) Or Switzerland@ymail.com. Or KJB3@ymail.com. Or KIAD@ymail.com. Or...

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

colin — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:22:16 -0000

Indeed ... yahoo mail and hotmail are so convoluted to use compared to gmail its not even funny. Rather than create a new domain, why not rebuild the service and make it usable.

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

carruthk — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:21:22 -0000

Think you're on the right track here, the 'so what' factor re this new service is almost non-existent.

Also the switching cost (in effort) is high for email addresses, so you might as well stay where you are.

BTW some anecdotal info about email and under-30's here at http://carruthk.blogspot.com/2008/06/un-email-g...

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

jasonkolb — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:43:37 -0000

I would also add that it may not be a good idea to chain yourself to a company that appears headed for the dead pool or at least massive upheaval. At least with Google you know your account and your data will be around for a while.

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

mathewi — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:18:06 -0000

Thanks, Rohan -- I agree that what teenagers do now may not be
representative of what they might do tomorrow. My point was that they
aren't a great market for this type of product right now, and yet they
are a very desirable advertising demographic that you might think
Yahoo would be interested in. Thanks for the info on Tucows'
surname-based domain service.

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

felicopter — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:03:04 -0000

Mathew, I see this as a bit of an excuse for them to get some "normal" press as a counterbalance to all the negative stuff -- and it worked, mostly.

I agree that the addition of the two domains is pretty lame. As my colleague James Koole remarked to me, while he can't be james@yahoo.com because that's gone, in a few hours james@ymail.com and james@rocketmail.com will be gone too! james4703@ymail.com isn't a whole lot better than james830362@yahoo.com.

I don't think that what teenagers do today is representative of what they will do tomorrow. Eventually people grow up and have to start communicating with people other than their friends and family, and unless they wish to be interrupted by those people, or let them into their Facebook, email will be how they want to be contacted.

Those willing to pay a small amount of money have more routes to a decent email address (i.e. without an unwieldy suffix) than those who consider only the free services. Registering your own domain like mathewingram.com is one way, but there's another, less well known, alternative: there are surname-based domains available for shared use. For instance, you can be mathew@ingram.net or mathew@ingram.org or mathew@ingram.to (or even ingram@mathew.com if you want that), because all those addresses are available through the Tucows Personal Names Service (disclosure: I am the product manager). This service is sold through Tucows resellers and is also available at NetIdentity.com (where it was invented; Tucows bought NetIdentity). There are around 40,000 surname-based domains available, including those three for Ingram -- nothing for Jayasekera, though!

Rohan Jayasekera

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

LH — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:27:07 -0000

I switched to a yahoo e-mail address back when @home went under. I swore to never have another ISP based e-mail address, and I've never used one since.

I only wonder how they're going to handle POP access. One nice thing with the gmail/apps solution is I can set these up with Thunderbird as my client, and have a nice all-around solution for e-mail (not a fan of the Gmail web interface). I'm actually in the process of switching from a Yahoo Hosting account for my business domain to my own server with the Gmail/Apps solution for the e-mail.

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

mathewi — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:28:06 -0000

That's an excellent point, 3rdparty -- which is exactly what I do with
@mathewingram.com.

Re: Yahoo’s Ymail: Don’t really get it

3rdparty — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:25:37 -0000

The safest email address practice is to register your own domain (on the cheap) and then either use google apps for your domain, or set it to forward to whatever service you like. That way if you ever need to change email providers in a hurry (or if gmail locks you out) you can just redirect the forwarder.