<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in WordPress: Going after Ning.com?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/wordpress_going_after_ningcom_76/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WordPress: Going after Ning.com?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/04/wordpress-going-after-ningcom/#comment-23687722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice one. I have stumbled and twittered this for my friends. Others no doubt will like it like I did.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Swing Trading</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress: Going after Ning.com?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/04/wordpress-going-after-ningcom/#comment-1739197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome, its great seeing the transition that Wordpress has gone through. Thanks for this info.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:57:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress: Going after Ning.com?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/04/wordpress-going-after-ningcom/#comment-204899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its funny: Ning always lacked the spark that would light a fire in my mind - it never seemed to have a focus that would provide a call to action to drive usage. Of course, its an infrastructure provider, but to me anyway, the concept of social network infrastructure is a little to "big" for mainstream adoption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wordpress, however, provides a simple-to-understand focal point (blogging) around which the social networking component can revolve. Wordpress blogs provide a gateway into the wider social networking offering - just the kind of conceptual bridge to enable it to take off. So -- good luck to them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rod / techwatching.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:23:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress: Going after Ning.com?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/04/wordpress-going-after-ningcom/#comment-201073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment, Matt.  Maybe I didn't phrase it properly -- I&lt;br&gt;didn't mean that Wordpress was going to build something like Facebook&lt;br&gt;or even something like Ning, but that Wordpress MU with enhancements&lt;br&gt;could become a platform for others to do pretty much the same kinds of&lt;br&gt;things that they can do with Facebook and Ning.  Would you agree with&lt;br&gt;that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Disqus&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress: Going after Ning.com?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/04/wordpress-going-after-ningcom/#comment-201055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're not going to start a social network to compete with Facebook any more than I would start a blog network to compete with Om. We're a technology company, we make platforms. That does put us tangentially in the same space as Ning, but I think our markets are different and I love the stuff that the Ning guys are doing, and have been for years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:10:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>