<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Why on earth would Google do a PC?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/why_on_earth_would_google_do_a_pc/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:28:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why on earth would Google do a PC?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/#comment-1291641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;please stop google...please stop google....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">professional web designer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why on earth would Google do a PC?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/#comment-1291640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;GOOG PC thing: two words -- sil-ly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skype at $2b thing: two words -- sil-ly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Stuart&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 23:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why on earth would Google do a PC?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/#comment-1291639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True enough, Rob -- it wasn't that long ago I was saying all the same things about how stupid it would be for eBay to pay $2-billion for Skype  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:55:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why on earth would Google do a PC?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/#comment-1291638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Completely agreed.  The rumour has drawn attention purely because it has geekish celebrity all over it.  But it makes absolutely no sense at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Which doesn't mean it won't happen. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hyndman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>