<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Why is everyone so down on Digg?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:21:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why is everyone so down on Digg?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/27/why-is-everyone-so-down-on-digg/#comment-1292857</link><description>True enough, Paul.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And thanks for the comment, Eric -- and the compliment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mathew</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is everyone so down on Digg?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/27/why-is-everyone-so-down-on-digg/#comment-1292861</link><description>I think that some are resistant to the communal power of digg and reddit for a variety of reasons: it's sloppy, it's geeky, it's low brow... it's not "cool" enough. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like digg, even though I wish it weren't so tech focused. I actually wish that some of these platforms (and MAN are there are a lot of start-ups out there trying to cash in on the digg-model) had a "blog" or even "Internet" category -- what's up with the lack of that? The reddit model is really fun in my view as you can vote comments up and down, which really satisfies some kind of primal e-urge! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that's the thing with digg and reddit -- they're satisfying platforms because they meet some kind of intuitive need to interact with both information and other community members at the same time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm afraid to say that like it or not resistance truly is futile. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a side note, you've emerged as my favorite tech blogger Mathew, awesome stuff as always !</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is everyone so down on Digg?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/27/why-is-everyone-so-down-on-digg/#comment-1292859</link><description>Mathew -- I'm assuming your question was rhetorical. Because the reason why people are down on Digg [&lt;em&gt;Ed. Cheap alliteration!&lt;/em&gt;] is the obvious one: It's easy to be down on Digg. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Technologists don't like it because the underlying code is a hack (I get coders sending me sniffingly dismissive notes weekly about how easy it would be to do a Digg); and media sorts think Digg is declasse. After all, it's .... incoherent ... overly broad ... full of shock schlock ... and so on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Put the two together, and you have duelling constituencies of noisy Digg dissers [&lt;em&gt;Ed. Enough with the "ds" already!&lt;/em&gt;].</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Kedrosky</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>