<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Why intellectual property doesn&amp;#8217;t exist</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:58:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why intellectual property doesn&amp;#8217;t exist</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/27/why-intellectual-property-doesnt-exist/#comment-187236</link><description>Thanks, Matt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Disqus</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:58:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why intellectual property doesn&amp;#8217;t exist</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/27/why-intellectual-property-doesnt-exist/#comment-187203</link><description>Does this make the RIAA 'Thought Police'? I'm averaging about three 1984 references a day at the moment - I think that's very telling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Totally agree with you and Cory here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Harwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:50:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>