DISQUS

Hello! Mathew's comments is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »

Subscribe
- New Comments
Community
Top Commenters
- mathewi
  1560 comments · 37 points
- ianbetteridge
  75 comments · 8 points
- JoeDuck
  57 comments · 1 points
- leigh
  46 comments · 6 points
- howardlindzon
  46 comments · 67 points
Popular Threads
- Crowdsourcing: Top iPhone apps
  3 weeks ago · 14 comments
- Was the NYT wrong to keep quiet? Yes
  4 days ago · 1 comment
Recent Comments
- I found your blog while I'm surfing the net. It's an interesting blog, I've added your blog to my favorites.
  9 hours ago by Robot Cleaner
  
  in The Twitter API: Giving away the store?
- I found your blog while I'm surfing the net. It's an interesting blog, I've added your blog to my favorites.
  9 hours ago by Robot Cleaner
  
  in Real launches DVD ripper — but why?
- It's a real shame that an area that could revolutionise radio as we know it (FM/AM) is being squashed like this. Internet radio allows very niche services to operate and be listened to by the...
  12 hours ago by Oxygen Online Radio
  
  in Is Internet radio on the brink?
- What a useful post here. Very informative for me..TQ friends... Cheers, <a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow">Buat Duit Dengan Blog</a>
  1 day ago by Traveller_Adventure
  
  in Shyftr: Feed theft or social news reader?
- "1. Just because the New York Times does something doesn't make it right. 2. Describing something as a rumour, or putting it in the form of a question, doesn't make it OK to...
  1 day ago by adele pace
  
  in Journalism, or irresponsible rumour-mongering?

Mathew's comments

Jump to original thread »

What happens when the cloud is down?

Started by mathewi · 1 year ago

A few days ago it was the RIM network that suddenly went down, cutting people off from their emails and other BlackBerry goodness (which some saw as a good thing rather than a catastrophe) — and this morning it was Amazon’s S3 network that suddenly went offline. The net ... Continue reading »

5 comments

Bob Warfield
1 year ago

We've gotten so good at reducing adoption friction, that we'll see a lot of this kind of thing. It just isn't possible to plan for it.

More on my blog:

http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/goog...

Best,

BW

reply

veverkap
1 year ago

I was under the impression that S3 was redundant. It claims to be decentralized.

reply

mathewi
1 year ago

I was under that impression too, Veverkap. The last time S3 had some
serious downtime, it was a DNS problem -- perhaps this was something
like that.

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Disqus

reply

Blagovest
1 year ago

There is a very important question you have to ask yourself before deciding whether to use S3: what are you really looking for - remote storage, content delivery, or both. These are crucial to distinguish.

What I observe is that most people treat Amazon S3 as a content delivery service. While this is not inherently wrong, one has to notice that S3 was especially designed to be a STORAGE service. S3 does not claim to be a CDN.

The point is, since terabyte hard drives are affordable nowadays and internet traffic grows steadily, the stress goes much more on content delivery and network infrastructure rather than on storage. If you are not concerned about using remote storage, there are much better services especially suited for content delivery.

SteadyOffload.com provides an innovative, subtle and convenient way to offload static content. The whole mechanism there is quite different from Amazon S3. Instead of permanently uploading your files to a third-party host, their cachebot crawls your site and mirrors the content in a temporary cache on their servers. Content remains stored on your server while it is being delivered from the SteadyOffload cache. The URL of the cached object on their server is dynamically generated at page loading time, very scrambled and is changing often, so you don’t have to worry about hotlinking. This means that there is an almost non-existent chance that the cached content gets exposed outside of your web application.

It’s definitely worth trying because it’s not a storage service like S3 but exactly a service for offloading static content.

Watch that:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-819391... (the video shows integration with WordPress, but it is integrable with any other webpage)
http://www.steadyoffload.com/
http://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Optimizati...

Cost of bandwidth comes under $0.2 per GB - affordable, efficient and convenient. Looks like a startup but lures me very much. Definitely simpler and safer than Amazon S3.

reply