Hello! Mathew's comments is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- List of pay per click programs: http://www.sitesreview.net/pay-per-click
- We are about to install Disqus on our server! This is a Great post Tnx and keep it up
- I’m only half-joking here. I think watching people’s behaviour inside such a game would be like an incredible real-world psychology laboratory in action.
- Google had been the number one most visited site in the world, there's no doubt about it for it has really cool features to offer for its users
- Hi every body, Further information on airlines of USA, UK and some other countries airlines information like aircraft’s images, cabins, phone numbers, address, baggage information, check in option,...
Jump to original thread »
I probably shouldn’t write about this, but I can’t help myself. I had a conversation with a copy editor at the Globe tonight, for a story on Lonelygirl15 (which is in the paper tomorrow — see post below), and I found it revealing and frustrating at the s
... Continue reading »
2 years ago
True, "Internet TV" has nothing to do with TV as a medium, but for many who are conversant in "new media topics", there is a shared understanding that the "TV" in "InternetTV" goes beyond the medium itself to characterize a type of content format.
For many people it is actually ripped television shows that are broadcast / streamed across the Internet.
For others, and for the purpose of your article, it is, as you say, short, episodic videos that have a lot in common with the content that is actually on television.
Then again, what do I know? Maybe that's what you actually said anyway. ;)
t @ dji
2 years ago
And if I had a TV tuner card in my computer and watched a broadcast on the computer screen, I'd call it watching TV. Meanwhile, if my wife and I watch a DVD movie on our TV set, we don't call it watching TV, we call it watching a video. (Well, we usually call it watching a movie, but we did get it from the "video" rental place.)
So I would argue that whether something is "TV" or not depends not on the particular screen that you watch a show on, but on what actions you take to see the show. Something that comes on automatically at a particular time is called television, while if you have to insert a physical DVD or videocassette it's called a video. In between lie the things that are on demand (like a DVD is) but don't come on a physical medium, such as cable Video On Demand and YouTube. I think that how likely one of these things is to be called TV is determined by how closely it resembles traditional TV. A TV show recorded and watched later through a VCR or DVR is still a TV show. Less obviously, Joost is Internet-based but you control it a lot like television: you select a "channel" and it plays the channel's shows in a sequence of its own choosing (though you can choose to override and jump to a later or earlier show). I would call watching Joost watching television. As for cable Video On Demand, I've heard people talking about watching things "on Rod" (Rogers On Demand), while others would say they were watching television. It wouldn't surprise me if people using Apple TV devices to watch YouTube videos say they're watching television.
2 years ago
From a user's perspective, I believe that television is a passive living room experience with a remote in hand. So if internet video is streamed onto a large screen with a remote to control it from the couch we should be able to call it "television".
However, I speculate that Rogers, CTV and Canwest would not call that television because it doesn't fit into standard broadcast channels, pipes and business models. i.e. if the traditional broadcast industry doesn't own the distribution channel and content, it's not television.
So who's right - the user or the industry that invented the word in the first place?
2 years ago
But then on the other side, when I watch Battlestar Galactica via an iTunes download, and I watch that on my computer (or even a video iPod), I don't feel like I'm watching television. It's a television show, that I'm watching on the computer.
Is someone using the TiVo to time-shift all their TV shows still watching television? Probably yes. But if those shows are tranferred to the computer and watched there? Probably not.
So even though the original entertainment is formatted for TV how it's been delivered has a lot to do with it, too.
Even though I've now thoroughly confused myself, I get what you're writing about, generally speaking, though.