<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in What&amp;#8217;s the GDP of Harry Potter?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/what8217s_the_gdp_of_harry_potter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:57:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the GDP of Harry Potter?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/07/06/whats-the-gdp-of-harry-potter/#comment-1315095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting fact. I wonder how Harry Potter stacks up when we start looking at measures like job creation or productivity? Quite favorably, I'd imagine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;True, the Afghan number would be higher if the drug trade was included, but what about HP merchandise or the incremental revenue generated for the book stores by all the additional foot traffic?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Dunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:57:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>