<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Webkinz and Advertising 2.0</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:12:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Webkinz and Advertising 2.0</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/webkinz-and-advertising-20/#comment-17033738</link><description>nice post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">talktalk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:12:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webkinz and Advertising 2.0</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/webkinz-and-advertising-20/#comment-689282</link><description>Webkinz are being marketed exactly the same as beanie babies yet more aggressively so they don't lose the flare that the beanie babies lost.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cameron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:01:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webkinz and Advertising 2.0</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/webkinz-and-advertising-20/#comment-35764</link><description>I agree, Karoli -- I don't see what the big deal is really. It seems&lt;br&gt;like Webkinz is taking all the precautions it can, which is fine with&lt;br&gt;me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:57:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webkinz and Advertising 2.0</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/webkinz-and-advertising-20/#comment-35694</link><description>What WebKinz should be grateful they are not dealing with is the fact that their toys are made in China.  That stopped me cold from buying one.  I no longer trust anything that carries that particular sticker on it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I truly don't understand what the hoo-ha is about advertising anyway.  If someone tells me that I can get something at a lower price or free as long as they're allowed to have ads associated with it, I'm fine with that.  There's no way on earth  that kids are going to be innoculated from advertising -- even walking down the street will expose them to something, somewhere.  So what?  Teach them to be discerning about it, don't shove popups in their face, and make sure the ads are age-appropriate and vetted first.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:19:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webkinz and Advertising 2.0</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/webkinz-and-advertising-20/#comment-35592</link><description>Actually, Anne, I thought you were pretty level-headed in that one&lt;br&gt;too, and made a number of worthwhile points. Let's just say it was&lt;br&gt;clear that you had strong feelings on the issue  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:20:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webkinz and Advertising 2.0</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/webkinz-and-advertising-20/#comment-35584</link><description>"The always level-headed Anne Zelenka": thanks for that, though I wasn't feeling so level-headed earlier in the week when I responded to Scott Karp's Twitter critique ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anne Z.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:10:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>