<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Web 2.0 &amp;mdash; mirage, distraction or gimmick&amp;#63;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/web_20_mdash_mirage_distraction_or_gimmick63/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:30:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 &amp;mdash; mirage, distraction or gimmick&amp;#63;</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/05/web-20-mirage-distraction-or-gimmick/#comment-1314504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Web 2.0 is really just another way of saying client/server or thin client/fat client.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The first interactive computer systems were the ultimate thin client -- the computer did all of the work, and all the client did was display output and accept keystrokes. (Anyone remember the Lear-Seigler ADM-3A, marketed as the Dumb Terminal?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Early web sites were static pages only, followed by dynamic pages -- but apart from a few browser widgets like dropdown lists, entry fields and pushbuttons, the client was still thin and dumb. (No hotel heiress jokes, please.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've now progressed along the continuum where the client's fatter and smarter -- and the web experience is much better for it. I bet Tim and Marc are happy to see the web the way it is now -- it was pretty geeky to begin with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yep -- Web 2.0 is here to stay, and that's a Good Thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Beamish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:30:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>