<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:48:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-389449</link><description>The potential cost of launching a new web venture nowadays can be close to 0, if you discount human labour and leverage free software/tools/platforms. For this reason, I don't see an Internet bubble in sight. I wrote about it all here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mappingtheweb.com/2008/03/20/there-is-no-internet-bubble-and-there-wont-ever-be/"&gt;http://www.mappingtheweb.com/2008/03/20/there-i...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aidan Henry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-384478</link><description>Wow -- I'm impressed that you were able to dismiss the past 100 years&lt;br&gt;or so worth of economic progress so quickly.  Nice work.  "All of&lt;br&gt;these created a few new big businesses -- and also lots of failed&lt;br&gt;businesses."  That pretty much describes every technology ever&lt;br&gt;invented since the industrial revolution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your comment reminds me of Warren Buffett's famous saying about how&lt;br&gt;the airline industry has been a net destroyer of capital since the&lt;br&gt;Wright Brother first flew at Kitty Hawk.  The upside?  We get to fly&lt;br&gt;places instead of taking boats and cars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-384436</link><description>"I had a feeling you would be dropping by, Seth."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, see, it wasn't different this time! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, you're confusing one component with an overall process. That's a very standard evangelist ploy, Since the laws of mathematics haven't changed, to a good approximation, the net results will never be different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;150 years ago, were their railroads like [BigName]? 100 years ago, was there TV and radio like [BigName]? 50 years ago, was there cheap air travel like [BigName]? All of these created a few new big businesses - and also lots of failed businesses. It's never different, in that there's always people running around saying that this time it's different.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-383412</link><description>i think that you and the mashable guy are focusing on&lt;br&gt;the wrong angle. with the exception of a handful of&lt;br&gt;very successful companies, most web 2.0 shops are&lt;br&gt;small fry. here's the problem: the CPMs utterly blow -&lt;br&gt;and unless you're a onesie, twosie shop and can keep&lt;br&gt;expense way low, it's tough to make a buck. more power&lt;br&gt;to anyone who can do that but then you're not talking&lt;br&gt;about the next google here. second point, in a&lt;br&gt;recession, who do you think is going to get whacked&lt;br&gt;first? that's easy. advertising-dependent startups.&lt;br&gt;i'm not saying the web 2.0 landscape will get&lt;br&gt;decimated but let's not close our eyes to what's&lt;br&gt;happening on the ground. also,.lots more enterprise&lt;br&gt;companies are getting into the space and they have&lt;br&gt;staying power just in case the economy heads south.&lt;br&gt;saw this post apropos...http://www.news.com/8301-10787_3-9929415-60.html?tag=nefd.top</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evan barton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-383357</link><description>Good one Mathew. I agree with you. I wrote a post about this a few days ago, in which I argued that web 2.0 technology has made the cost of starting a web service drop to almost zero. That allows anyone with an idea (it doens't have o be a good idea) to start a business. But lowering the thresholds to create new services doesn’t make the process of creating a great service ANY easier. It still requires craftsmanship. Web technology has brought us democracy, but it comes at a cost.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander van Elsas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-383284</link><description>I had a feeling you would be dropping by, Seth.  You know the funny&lt;br&gt;thing about saying "It's different this time?" Sometimes it really&lt;br&gt;*is* different -- and refusing to acknowledge that is just as much an&lt;br&gt;example of blinkered, head-in-the-sand behaviour as the opposite.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was there a distributed server cluster like Amazon's S3 back in the&lt;br&gt;first bubble? No. Or if there was, it was orders of magnitude more&lt;br&gt;expensive than what startups can currently afford -- that's a real&lt;br&gt;difference in economics. So is the existence of Google Apps, and of&lt;br&gt;Amazon's EC2 and Simple DB, and even of Basecamp, for that matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those things make a difference -- maybe not enough to turn a dumb idea&lt;br&gt;into a smart one, but enough to make it easier to try them both out&lt;br&gt;and figure out which is which.  In the last bubble that didn't become&lt;br&gt;obvious until after the IPO.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-383145</link><description>companies will come and go, money will change hands, but the trend is the thing to watch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obvious that the technology is here to stay, no deaths from start up hyperbole, and good ideas get out regardless of the economy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Millions of small businesses are doing things more efficiently due to the net, billions of consumers lives are better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post, those pundits have myopia. You have it right</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">warrenwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:56:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 2.0 in limbo? Let&amp;#8217;s get a grip</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/25/web-20-in-limbo-lets-get-a-grip/#comment-382365</link><description>Bah, humbug.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This post regurgitates the most dangerous idea: "IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As in: "The bottom line is that the Web makes it so much easier to start and run a business " - it's different! Not like the old bubble! DON'T LEARN THAT LESSON!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, I'd argue starting and running a real business is pretty much as hard as it's always been. People are confusing a shift in expenses with a revolution in economics.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>