<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Video comments: Actually not so bad</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:42:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Video comments: Actually not so bad</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/14/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad/#comment-467217</link><description>You can't yet, but Daniel Ha of Disqus has assured me (and lots of&lt;br&gt;other people) that it's in the works, along with trackbacks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video comments: Actually not so bad</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/14/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad/#comment-467012</link><description>ive been thinking about adding it but im just not sure about video comments. guess ill just have to give it a go. im still trying to decide about disqus, you still cant export your data right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidusher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:11:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video comments: Actually not so bad</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/14/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad/#comment-465650</link><description>They could, Allen -- but that's part of why I think video makes more&lt;br&gt;sense for comments than it does for posts.  It's good for quick&lt;br&gt;thoughts or messages, but not for longer-form (unless you are&lt;br&gt;spectacularly interesting).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:39:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video comments: Actually not so bad</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/14/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad/#comment-465604</link><description>what's interesting is that you note mike going off on wired and fred talking into his webcam - in both of those cases you speak about the post author. they could easily embed a video into their post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">allen stern</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video comments: Actually not so bad</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/14/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad/#comment-465176</link><description>I think you're right, Guin -- no one is forcing anyone to make (or&lt;br&gt;watch) a video comment. But some people might actually feel more&lt;br&gt;comfortable expressing themselves in video rather than text. And as&lt;br&gt;you point out, text comments can be long and rambling and poorly&lt;br&gt;focused as well. I don't see video as an option being that huge a deal&lt;br&gt;really.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:33:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video comments: Actually not so bad</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/14/video-comments-actually-not-so-bad/#comment-465098</link><description>I like the option of video replies. If we were only given the option to do video and NOT text, that would drastically reduce the amount of conversation a blog would get. Providing video replies as one option is nice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't buy the argument that it disrupts conversation flow. I took a look at the long thread at A VC and it was easy to scan and play video clips if I chose to. I didn' t have to play them at all if I didn't want to and still could follow the conversation easily.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also don't buy the argument that video = rambling. Text does not mean the reply will be a better value. Either can provide value to the conversation or be completely useless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guinevere</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>