<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:51:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-9263285</link><description>thank you i noe wat you mean verizon cant get any stupider than this it is stupid stupid STUPID STUPID!!!!!!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nathaly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304661</link><description>My thoughts are with you and your countrymen, Laurent.  Merci pour votre comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304659</link><description>Needless to say, Mathew, that France follows the same stupid way ... We also have a cartel with same private game preserve... Wanna help for another French Revolution ? ;-) I need each and every willing person. &lt;br&gt;Crickeely, LVG &lt;a href="http://www.crickee.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.crickee.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurent VERMOT-GAUCHY</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304658</link><description>Mathew ...ya think?&lt;br&gt;The phone company doesn't know from free?&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vera Bass</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304656</link><description>Some link love from Canada.  Yessss.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would prefer wallstrip but i will take it :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;78 degrees here in Phoenix.  Almost cardigan weather.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304654</link><description>Thanks Vera.  That's a good question.  I think they are afraid of losing the kind of control that has been a big part of their business models for so long.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304652</link><description>Love this post, Mathew.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The telephone companies have an advantage to exploit in terms of delivery systems. Why are they futzing around with content models???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vera</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vera Bass</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:12:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304650</link><description>I couldn't agree more, Drums.  It's a bit of a cartel here in Canada too, when you get right down to it.  Reminds me of the Internet access business in the early days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304648</link><description>The whole wireless company structure is driving me nuts.  I have Cingular, who tells you that you can access the Web with their Razr and then makes it so difficult that it's worthless, unless, of course, you want to shell out the 46 bucks a month for their EDGE/GSM services, which of course if you do, will also require that you upgrade to one of the Windows Mobile, Palm or Blackberries they have available, etc etc ad infinitum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The cellular companies could benefit from a disruptive competitor who came in and shifted around the fee/rate structures, i think.  Or at least, consumers might.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DnW</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DrumsNWhistles</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:33:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304646</link><description>The cellphone industry has their head up their arses in an amazing way when it comes to everything. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Case in point: &lt;a href="http://rogers.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;rogers.com&lt;/a&gt; still charged by the KILOBYTE for data usage. With EDGE phones.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:11:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon: Stupid, stupid, stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/28/verizon-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-1304645</link><description>But what do you really think? :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hyndman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:00:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>