<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in United&amp;#8217;s share slide: A comedy of errors</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/united8217s_share_slide_a_comedy_of_errors/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:05:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: United&amp;#8217;s share slide: A comedy of errors</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/09/uniteds-share-slide-a-comedy-of-errors/#comment-2253718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been wondering when this would happen.  I do a lot of research on the Net and I've noticed a lot of content is now appearing undated.  I think it's because the websites don't want their content to age.  A lot of news and analysis websites don't date their information which is a shame and this is a prime example why.&lt;br&gt;All blog, news and reporting should be dated clearly.  But it's not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: United&amp;#8217;s share slide: A comedy of errors</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/09/uniteds-share-slide-a-comedy-of-errors/#comment-2250663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the exchange can't really do much about the fact that&lt;br&gt;people traded without even checking the facts. It happens from time to&lt;br&gt;time when people trade the wrong stock symbol too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: United&amp;#8217;s share slide: A comedy of errors</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/09/uniteds-share-slide-a-comedy-of-errors/#comment-2250612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The worst part is that those with stop-loss orders weren't protected as they usually would be if it was an error in the exchange's software. Apparently NASDAQ won't "bust" the trades because they consider that people were simply selling on news that they don't police.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:02:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>