<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 06:07:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/twitter-waste-of-time-or-social-tool/#comment-8977880</link><description>What's it cost to Twitter... not much...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;COMPARATIVE COST FACTS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About 82% of web cost per click (cpc) advertising costs from $ 0.00 to $ 0.30 (cents cpc) and of that more than half is between $ 0.10 and  $ 0.19 (cents cpc) Say you pay an average of $0.15 cpc 1200 clicks will cost you $180.00&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"SEM firms typically bill monthly. They manage your PPC search advertising and paid-inclusion spend. For core professional services, which include complete SEO, expect to spend from $90,000 to $240,000 per Web site annually for a full-service SEM firm or $50,000 to $90,000 for a solo consultant or smaller SEM company." &lt;a href="http://clickz.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;clickz.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Advertising budget?? Take autos as an example: Cost per click for "autos" is $0.29 - $0.64, Clicks per day is 9,800 - 12,400, Cost per day $2,830.00k - $7,980.00 spread between a reported 4 advertisers. &lt;a href="http://spyfu.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;spyfu.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So that's on average $10,810.00 per day / 4 = $2702.50 X 365 days = $ 986,412.50 p.a. / 12 = $82,201.04 p.month&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I ask again considering the potential reach of Twitter is it worth it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ric &lt;a href="http://tr.im/kplb" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tr.im/kplb&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Townsend</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 06:07:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/twitter-waste-of-time-or-social-tool/#comment-36032</link><description>I think it might have some business applications. Here's my (slightly contrived) situation &lt;a href="http://www.bookbook.com.au/wordpress/?p=97" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.bookbook.com.au/wordpress/?p=97&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:59:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/twitter-waste-of-time-or-social-tool/#comment-33873</link><description>Hey, I read your blog every day..... :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antje wilsch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/twitter-waste-of-time-or-social-tool/#comment-33485</link><description>Thanks, Antje -- I'll put you down under "waste of time"  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:29:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/twitter-waste-of-time-or-social-tool/#comment-33453</link><description>Definitely a waste of time. I work in high tech and no one i know over the age of 30 uses (or even really understands) twitter - except the blogosphere who, in all fairness, needs to keep up with this constant news feed as it's part of their job. This is not saying there isn't a place for it. But older people (meaning: older than 30!) are generally too busy solving problems at work, home lives with families, etc. I have a cell phone, email on my cell, skype, and IM. People can reach me if they need but they certainly do not need to be kept updated of my every useless thought.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antje wilsch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/twitter-waste-of-time-or-social-tool/#comment-33434</link><description>That still doesn't answer the question though  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:42:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Waste of time or social tool?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/twitter-waste-of-time-or-social-tool/#comment-33374</link><description>Well, I found that you put this post up via twitter, soooo...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>