<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Twitter as a news tool: A case study</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:01:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter as a news tool: A case study</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/16/twitter-as-a-news-tool-a-case-study/#comment-1599027</link><description>Very cool indeed, Daniel.  Thanks for the comment -- and for being a long-time Globe and Mail fan as well  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as a news tool: A case study</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/16/twitter-as-a-news-tool-a-case-study/#comment-1594102</link><description>Matthew - It's really cool how we were able to use Twitter to break the story, and that people actually thought of contacting us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a personal note, I went to school in Buffalo, and I always looked forward to my forays over to Toronto, where I picked up the Globe and Mail!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:39:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as a news tool: A case study</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/16/twitter-as-a-news-tool-a-case-study/#comment-1554780</link><description>Examples like this are becoming more and more common. I recently saw a list (I forget where) of all newspapers that have twitter accounts and are using them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More importantly, many newsrooms have people *watching* their twitter accounts and are therefore able to respond and react to incoming tweets...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jasonp107</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:23:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as a news tool: A case study</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/16/twitter-as-a-news-tool-a-case-study/#comment-1533341</link><description>That's a good point, Sid -- for some things, video is definitely&lt;br&gt;better. We've already started to see more cellphone video of news&lt;br&gt;events being submitted by readers to news sites and places like&lt;br&gt;NowPublic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as a news tool: A case study</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/16/twitter-as-a-news-tool-a-case-study/#comment-1531369</link><description>Interesting.  I'm curious to see whether video based versions (12 Seconds, Seesmic, etc) will similarly take off. It seems to me that video is a much better medium to spread news, but I don't record very often because of the effort required to get a good recording - versus text which comes out clear every time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sidsavara</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:11:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>