<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Twitter and Pownce need to merge</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:20:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter and Pownce need to merge</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-93090</link><description>Yeah, I agree -- I just think it's too late for Pownce to grab much momentum&lt;br&gt;away from Twitter.  They're benefiting massively from network effects now --&lt;br&gt;I get four or five people following me a day, and virtually nothing on&lt;br&gt;Pownce.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter and Pownce need to merge</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-93066</link><description>Looks like a case when 1 + 1 could equal 3. Interesting concept.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buckpost</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter and Pownce need to merge</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-92984</link><description>I'm with you on the merging. I've been trying to use both today back and forth and it's tiring. Even with fairly different feature sets/selling points, I think there is only room for one of them to reach mass appeal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>