Hello! Mathew's comments is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- www.mathewingram.com/work Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I look forward to seing the outcome at the end of this.
- The internet is shaping and evolving so fast, but people take a long time to change their ways.
- life is just so fragile, we shoud never take it for granted.
- It is very sad, I have a freind who is dying of cancer. She however can do nothing much except sleep at the moment.
- Hi Mathew, I'm glad you finally got an iPhone. I remember you mentioning you wanted one but had a Blackberry for work. I'm a big fan of the Panorama application... and Bejeweled 2.
Jump to original thread »
I’m not sure whether Pat Phelan of roam4free has decided to join the Techmeme troll parade, but his post about the “cost of Twitter” is ridiculous on its face. In a nutshell, he takes an estimate of the number of users, multiplies by the average time spent a
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
And saying still Twitter is far more interesting than Solitaire does not solve the issue.
But look at the bright side : exposure in minutes is what sets the value for advertising in all media- tv, radio, blog and twitter. Main difference is that Twitter provides content generated by its own users.
1 year ago
Thanks for the post, if I had wanted to join the techmeme troll parade I think a post on Scoble/Facebook he loves it/he loves it not would probably have been an easy way to do it.
The really dumb part of your post was your assumption that my analysis confirmed that Twitter was a waste of time.
Never in the post did I say mention that Twitter was a waste of time but just point ed out the time usage, in fact I am a huge Twitter fan and everyday user.
1 year ago
but unless I'm mistaken, the whole point of your post was to put a
dollar value on lost productivity as a result of Twitter use, so I
think the implication is obvious.
1 year ago