-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
scrawledinwax
23 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 69 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
2 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Are independent bloggers an endangered species?
2 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Bloggers, trust, MSM and correction fluid
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Why media outlets want Facebook Connect
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
First Read: Follow the Breadcrumbs : CJR
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
And saying still Twitter is far more interesting than Solitaire does not solve the issue.
But look at the bright side : exposure in minutes is what sets the value for advertising in all media- tv, radio, blog and twitter. Main difference is that Twitter provides content generated by its own users.
Thanks for the post, if I had wanted to join the techmeme troll parade I think a post on Scoble/Facebook he loves it/he loves it not would probably have been an easy way to do it.
The really dumb part of your post was your assumption that my analysis confirmed that Twitter was a waste of time.
Never in the post did I say mention that Twitter was a waste of time but just point ed out the time usage, in fact I am a huge Twitter fan and everyday user.
but unless I'm mistaken, the whole point of your post was to put a
dollar value on lost productivity as a result of Twitter use, so I
think the implication is obvious.