<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Trying to launder MySpace history?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/trying_to_launder_myspace_history/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:51:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Trying to launder MySpace history?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/trying-to-launder-myspace-history/#comment-1295318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My bad.  You know, somewhere deep down, I knew that Gawker owned Valleywag, but I guess I got thrown by the fact that Nick was so criical of the post, and that his comment effectively said Valleywag was a takeoff of Gawker, which itself was a takeoff of Spy, which was a takeoff of Private Eye, etc.  That Denton -- always trying to throw people off the scent   :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trying to launder MySpace history?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/trying-to-launder-myspace-history/#comment-1295316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Denton's company, Gawker Media, owns Valleywag. (I publish it.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Douglas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trying to launder MySpace history?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/trying-to-launder-myspace-history/#comment-1295314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt, this would be space to watch. This was not a tip, rather it was 'bought' out. The ramifications are bigger. "Slander" and "libel" from either side is now possible. After all, it was a journalist /reporter who did the inital research and valleywag who is publishing..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IMH, myspace is a spamworld2.0 , but this is kinda legit, because, their users need to wade thru the spam for them to get to their services. The big question, here would be --was that organic in nature or was it straegic in nature.. ??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My gut feeling sez, theres much more to what the eye is seeing.. after all Myspace is the biggest property out there - and how fast ?? 2.5 yrs ?? 3yrs ?? thats quite the business eh ??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">/pd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>