<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Tinfoil hat alert: Digg has secret editors!</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:25:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tinfoil hat alert: Digg has secret editors!</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/17/tinfoil-hat-alert-digg-has-secret-editors/#comment-87498</link><description>Just one question, Carl: what makes you think my behind is fat?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A piece of advice: Don't like the blog? Don't read it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tinfoil hat alert: Digg has secret editors!</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/17/tinfoil-hat-alert-digg-has-secret-editors/#comment-87327</link><description>what a bizarre blog. you sit on your rump and spend your time putting down supposedly lesser scribes . i'm not a huge valleywag fan but i'd have a lot more respect for you if you actually got off your fat behind and did some real reporting. how `bout it, matthew?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carl plesser</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:14:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tinfoil hat alert: Digg has secret editors!</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/17/tinfoil-hat-alert-digg-has-secret-editors/#comment-84912</link><description>I'll tell Deep Digg you said so right after I ask him "what's the frequency Kenneth?" :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:30:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tinfoil hat alert: Digg has secret editors!</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/17/tinfoil-hat-alert-digg-has-secret-editors/#comment-84889</link><description>I definitely agree there could be more openness about the process, MG&lt;br&gt;-- and the same goes for Wikipedia too, for that matter.  It's just&lt;br&gt;that all the over-the-top writing about "shadowy" cabals and secret&lt;br&gt;handshakes and crap like that really pushes me over the edge&lt;br&gt;sometimes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tinfoil hat alert: Digg has secret editors!</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/17/tinfoil-hat-alert-digg-has-secret-editors/#comment-84883</link><description>I have a brilliant idea. Don't read Valleywag. It comes thru my Google Reader as Snippets, and I never slow myself down by getting too involved.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hardaway</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:21:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tinfoil hat alert: Digg has secret editors!</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/17/tinfoil-hat-alert-digg-has-secret-editors/#comment-84874</link><description>Ha Deep Digg. Nice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, as I've quite literally exhausted myself writing about this on numerous sites, the problem isn't with the editors, it's the complete lack of transparency in the process.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:17:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>