<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Those server farms are expensive</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:37:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Those server farms are expensive</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/11/those-server-farms-are-expensive/#comment-1294644</link><description>That's true to a certain extent, Markus -- although it's still the rate of growth that's the concern, not necessarily the spending per se.  And while processor speeds are doubling, power demands are continuing to grow as well, and that is arguably a bigger cost than buying the CPUs in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:37:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those server farms are expensive</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/11/those-server-farms-are-expensive/#comment-1294642</link><description>Ya  but a lot of this stuff is one time expenses.    That and  CPU power is doubling every 18 months...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:34:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those server farms are expensive</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/11/those-server-farms-are-expensive/#comment-1294640</link><description>yeah thats why Goog's is moving farms offshore too :)_ &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/5254/945/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/5254/945/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">/pd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:46:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>