<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in The Pirate Bay cannot be stopped</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/the_pirate_bay_cannot_be_stopped_43/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:49:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Pirate Bay cannot be stopped</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/11/the-pirate-bay-cannot-be-stopped/#comment-73783</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think Swedish law permits that sort of thing (a similar&lt;br&gt;attempt in Canada failed), but I could be wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:49:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Pirate Bay cannot be stopped</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/11/the-pirate-bay-cannot-be-stopped/#comment-73781</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there was a similar story about a month ago with torrentspy. In the end the court pressed torrentspy to provide ip adresses of its users. I wonder where this story will go...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robojiannis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:43:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>