<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:11:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305300</link><description>Look at this website  -  its a better way of using pixel ads...  &lt;a href="http://www.milliondollaremployment.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.milliondollaremployment.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:11:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305298</link><description>I totally agree and I'm just tired of all these pixel ads. I have to say that this madness motivated me to open &lt;a href="http://www.purewasteoftime.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.purewasteoftime.com&lt;/a&gt;, and start an experiment. I'm wondering if it is possible to waste 1.000.000 $ before pixelotto is sold out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">misw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305297</link><description>Hi Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Certainly a different, though still similar concept.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is some feedback&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. I don't like the colour scheme much, and the default font choice makes it hard to read without liberal use of ctrl+ in Firefox&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. I think you need to disclose more about how the prizes are scaled. You need to be much more specific.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. You are missing a key element that I am sure Alex is going to use, some kind of registration process / membership to the site&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. Your prize claim system is fairly flawed. You could at the very least have created some kind of contact form to format the entries&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5. I noticed &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Ha, OK. My name is Rob, I'm 20 and from Hull, England, UK. That's all you need to know right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Alex had the success because there was a personal message, and you are trying to hide, at least to a degree.&lt;br&gt;Even your copyright at the bottom of the page is to your domain name and probably not a legal entity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305295</link><description>I beat him too it. I honestly did. And with a better concept too. The odds of winning my competition are much greater! You can check my site out here &lt;a href="http://www.cashcells.co.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cashcells.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; .Cheers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:47:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305293</link><description>It's not original, but people will do it. So he'll make money.&lt;br&gt;Plus there will be some larger players.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want to see a unique concept based on the million dollar homepage madness, check out The Wall -- &lt;a href="http://www.seethewall.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.seethewall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 07:49:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305291</link><description>Hi Matthew&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe this one will sell out faster than the original and he will make a huge amount more money on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason website owners buy the pixels is because they want traffic, and maybe a backlink from the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The lotto is legal, because the winners are not having to pay for a ticket, they are just visitors who click on adverts, visit sites, and probably have to read the site for a certain number of seconds before they "earn" their lotto prize entry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lots of traffic exchange programs work on a similar manual clicking system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He also has a nice backend... email addresses from subscriptions. I am sure he will be able to use that to promote anything he likes in the future, and to drive additional traffic back to the site over the coming months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That incentive to click is going to to mean a many fold increase in traffic over the previous incarnation, and I haven't heard of many complaints about his first effort.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This site is a true next generation of the same idea, unlike many of the copycat sites based on selling pixels, words etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this time around the advertising will be much better organised, and there will be some much larger players involved from day one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305289</link><description>Mathew, I'm going on bet he sells out within a couple of weeks.  He's getting the buzz and it will only climb until he gives away $1,000,000.  If he was really smart, he'll have a $5,000,000 program ready to launch right after this one to capitalize on the buzz....I would.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;George</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George Tsiolis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:45:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305287</link><description>Pixels for pennies:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.PixleLotto.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.PixleLotto.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:32:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305285</link><description>Don't you mean "sheep-le", not people?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hehe, you know, this one will also work because of the million dollar giveaway. The only way this won't work is if the press ignores it. We'll see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, why isn't anyone talking about how this is going to be tough to do because it's essentially a lotto, right? It's my understanding that their are strict guidelines on lotteries, even if your living in the UK. Anyone?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:35:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305282</link><description>Agreed. On the other hand, why not do it if people are stupid enough to play along? Thanks for the comment, Jim.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:14:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The new Pixelotto &amp;#8212; a tax on the stupid</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/02/the-new-pixelotto-a-tax-on-the-stupid/#comment-1305278</link><description>yeah, I agree with you Matthew. He's going to ride this wave for at least another half a million. I'm very dissapointed in the idea though. I was hoping that his next thing would be original, not pixel related. Pixels are so played, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>