<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in The great blog payola debate continues</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:29:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The great blog payola debate continues</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/13/the-great-blog-payola-debate-continues/#comment-1296590</link><description>Thanks for the comment, Mike. I guess things sometimes come out sounding a bit different when you write them, because of the clout that TechCrunch has. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for Text Link Ads, I just have a personal thing about them -- I hate the way that they try to mimic hyperlinks and fool people into clicking them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I share your feelings about the whole payola thing -- I'm just not sure that there's a whole lot we can do about it, other than point it out when we see it and hope people eventually learn how to spot it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The great blog payola debate continues</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/13/the-great-blog-payola-debate-continues/#comment-1296587</link><description>Mathew - I didn't mean to come across as arrogant. When writing something negative about a sponsor it's hard to pick the right words and I may not have done a good job in this case. I agree with most of what you write, but I don't see the issue with TLA's main product at all. Maybe that's a discussion for another time...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael arrington</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>