<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in The architecture of news</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:16:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The architecture of news</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/11/the-architecture-of-news/#comment-646214</link><description>This plays into Ballmers comments on the death of newspapers. interesting link and analysis. thx.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mattroberts</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:16:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The architecture of news</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/11/the-architecture-of-news/#comment-641867</link><description>Like yourself, I totally agree with everything Upendra has to say-- especially the part about navigation being key. Not only can bad navigation hide content, but it can make users feel stupid and at fault if they can't find what they're looking for. And when you make someone feel stupid, they'll generally not want to stick around for too long.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:07:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>