<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Thanks for nothing, Viacom</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:23:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thanks for nothing, Viacom</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/03/thanks-for-nothing-viacom/#comment-1312896</link><description>Thanks for the comment, Jason.  I did point out that sampling only removed videos distorts the results somewhat. And I have read Shelly Palmer's piece on YouTube -- but I think that he is overstating the case somewhat, as I think you are with the bootleg DVD analogy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, thanks for commenting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thanks for nothing, Viacom</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/03/thanks-for-nothing-viacom/#comment-1312895</link><description>These stats are completely bogus.  Henry Blodget should be embarrassed to write about them.  I wouldn't be surprised if he removes the post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can't just count removed videos from a site that does not remove videos.  It's completely ridiculous.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Listen, the nay-sayers are right about YouTube.  (You should read Shelly Palmer's article on Media 3.0 -- &lt;a href="http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2006/11/youtube_without.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Where's the Business?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no business, any different than the guy standing on the corner selling bootleg DVD's. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Jason</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:23:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>