<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Technorati: Too little, too late?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/technorati_too_little_too_late_70/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:59:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Technorati: Too little, too late?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/04/technorati-too-little-too-late/#comment-27117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn't agree more M. The way I see it, what problem(s) does it solve for me? It doesn't as far as I can tell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If it doesn't solve any problems for me, or entertain me, why should I use it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:59:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati: Too little, too late?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/04/technorati-too-little-too-late/#comment-26812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair to Technorati, I find a lot of splogs in Blogsearch too. I am not sure what the solution is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SV</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:59:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>