http://mathewingram.disqus.com/enWed, 28 May 2008 10:46:05 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/27/techmeme-vs-hacker-news/#comment-541798<p>Thanks, Yegg -- that's pretty cool. I like the stripped-down<br>interface as well. Nice job.</p>mathewiWed, 28 May 2008 10:46:05 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/27/techmeme-vs-hacker-news/#comment-540941<p>Check out <a href="http://hacker.watrcoolr.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://hacker.watrcoolr.us">http://hacker.watrcoolr.us</a></p><p>It is an aggregation of (parts of) all of the above I put together last week.</p>Gabriel WeinbergWed, 28 May 2008 08:03:54 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/27/techmeme-vs-hacker-news/#comment-539729<p>That's a good point, Julian. The criteria that determine what moves<br>up on Techmeme are different, and are mostly to do with writing and<br>linking, whereas Hacker News is strictly direct voting (although you<br>could argue that writing about a post and linking to it is a kind of<br>vote as well).</p>mathewiTue, 27 May 2008 23:46:04 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/27/techmeme-vs-hacker-news/#comment-539686<p>Great post. It would be interesting to see how well your conclusions hold up with more data. Techmeme is conversation driven and that is a lot different from voting. I wonder how this influences which content is popular on each service. </p>Julian BaldwinTue, 27 May 2008 23:37:27 -0000