<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Symbian: Android for the rest of us?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:45:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Symbian: Android for the rest of us?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/#comment-739089</link><description>Thanks for the comment, Peter -- those are definitely aspects of the&lt;br&gt;Symbian world that will hold things back, I agree. And someone else&lt;br&gt;mentioned how integrated the iPhone is with the Mac OS, so that&lt;br&gt;programming for one can be leveraged to make apps for the other.&lt;br&gt;That's something Symbian doesn't really have at all, I don't think,&lt;br&gt;which is going to be a detraction as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:45:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symbian: Android for the rest of us?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/#comment-738156</link><description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; it is going to draw developers in just because of its sheer mass and size. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope. Not necessarily. The key for developers hearts and minds center around a couple of things - is it cool, is it hard to program (and thirdly - can I make money).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Symbian phones are not cool, they are bloody hard to program (multiple platforms and other integration issues) plus right now how do I make money? What's the killer app?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nobody knows. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peter</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Cranstone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:48:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symbian: Android for the rest of us?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/#comment-737507</link><description>Those are both good points.  The upgrade cycle is definitely shorter&lt;br&gt;(and easier) when it comes to a phone compared to a desktop or laptop&lt;br&gt;-- and I think you're also right that Apple made a smart move by&lt;br&gt;effectively tying the iPhone and the existing Apple developer base&lt;br&gt;together like that. Speeds up the process of development, and lowers&lt;br&gt;the cost as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:27:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symbian: Android for the rest of us?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/#comment-737472</link><description>I agree that the sheer number of smart phones using a given OS is very relevant in the short to mid term, but moving forward it will be ease-of-development that will make or break things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know how often people around the world upgrade their phones - every 24 months perhaps on average? If so, the existing user base is a real moving target, and doesn't really have that much invested in remaining with their existing OS when it is time to get a new phone. Changing to a new OS on a phone is way easier than changing OS on a desktop/laptop computer, and way cheaper than replacing all your DVDs with the latest and greatest technology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So when it is time to replace an old phone people will go with the snazziest looking phone with the most applications they think they'll need. So the faster developers can create/clone those apps the more successful they'll be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure the iPhone is pretty and has an interesting UI, but arguably the best thing Apple did was base iPhone development on existing OS X development -- they've lowered the bar for developers that already develop in OS X which got the momentum going early.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seemsArtless</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:21:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>