<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Sometimes the news can&amp;#8217;t wait</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:22:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sometimes the news can&amp;#8217;t wait</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/23/sometimes-the-news-cant-wait/#comment-729550</link><description>I suppose that's true, Rick -- except that if something close to&lt;br&gt;journalism is involved, there might be more protection for the person&lt;br&gt;who got fired for doing it, as opposed to if he was just engaging in&lt;br&gt;21st-century social interaction.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sometimes the news can&amp;#8217;t wait</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/23/sometimes-the-news-cant-wait/#comment-728966</link><description>"Was the person who changed the Wikipedia page committing an act of journalism, or divulging privileged information?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about neither? As far as I can tell, this person was simply engaging in normal 21st century social interaction. Using terms like "publishing", "journalism" and "news" just obscures the simple reality of it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>