<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Social networking and media isn&amp;#8217;t all good</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:11:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social networking and media isn&amp;#8217;t all good</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/22/social-networking-and-media-isnt-all-good/#comment-1295858</link><description>Good point, Ian.  Lots of work left for lawyers, at any rate  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social networking and media isn&amp;#8217;t all good</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/22/social-networking-and-media-isnt-all-good/#comment-1295857</link><description>Good question, Mathew.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Liability remains an interesting question throughout this space that needs to be settled:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Networks &amp;amp; stalking&lt;br&gt;YouTube (and the rest) &amp;amp; copyright&lt;br&gt;Blogging &amp;amp; libel&lt;br&gt;Doocing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As usual, the internet dynamic is towards free speech and so forth.. but where does the buck stop with that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Delaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:20:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>