-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/21/social-media-gets-duped-just-like-old-media/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
StevenHodson
37 comments · 66 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 71 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 44 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Daily Mirror editor says to forget about SEO
3 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
The Dallas Morning News pulls down the wall
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Peabody Hotel, Memphis
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Video of my TEDx Toronto talk
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Go ahead: Ask me a question
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Daily Mirror editor says to forget about SEO
Earlier in the year I had a problem with my Gmail account and did a blog post about it - at first I thought it was a bug.
Of course the prospect of a Gmail bug got "Dugg" - 1 hour and 4,000 hits later (it hit the front page of digg in about 20 minutes) I realized what the issue was (It was not a bug but rather a - i think - stupid feature). By that time the damage was done though and there was no mechanism aside from my one vote to undig & bury the story to do anything about it. I edited the post to correct it and emailed digg admins but at that point all I could do was sit back and watch. It eventually got force buried by the admins but it's still on the site. Even after the post was corrected & numerous comments were made saying it was incorrect it still kept getting dugg at a furious pace (almost 900 total) - people just didn't seem to care or read it, they saw Gmail, Bug and Dugg it.
(Heck it got slashdotted two days later even though it had been corrected for over 48 hours - so clearly they don't even read the stories sometimes)
I don't know why they would have outright deleted the story though , doesn't make any sense... unless Sony's lawyers had a word about them. Those Diggs, even when buried still get found all the time (I still get 10-20 hits a week via that link)
Seriously though, thanks for the comment, Ryan.