<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Snapshot: comments on Google News</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:35:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Snapshot: comments on Google News</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/29/snapshot-comments-on-google-news/#comment-22419</link><description>That's interesting, Tony. I could see that kind of thing being really&lt;br&gt;useful for complicated or nuanced medical or scientific stories, so&lt;br&gt;that people could get more detail or background or differing opinions&lt;br&gt;if they wish. Just another way in which Google is making my day job&lt;br&gt;irrelevant. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Snapshot: comments on Google News</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/29/snapshot-comments-on-google-news/#comment-22415</link><description>Actually I've seen them loads of times (therefore I guess its not just a US thing) ... they're actually pretty cool, and do add another dimension to the story sometimes.  At other times, they allow people who only got a one-sentence sound-byte to expound on their positions.  I've seen quite a few examples of this related to medical news, for example</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:27:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>