7 comments

• 

  Nav

  2 years ago

  I think 'we bloggers' are a little annoyed by app integration in Facebook, as it's almost like one has to maintain two separate online lives, linked loosely by widgets. However, Facebook does do a couple of things well: it provides a space for consolidation for people who don't maintain a blog and have no desire to; and it also seems to be becoming like the Windows of the Internet. Although the diffuse nature of the 'net is its greatest asset, it is also its most alienating: by providing a centralised, 'neutral' platform (I use the latter term loosely), Facebook opens access to things like Flickr, Twitter, Jaiku, last.fm etc. to those who would otherwise be completely intimidated by Web 2.0 and the blogosphere.
  reply
• 

  Lara

  2 years ago

  Facebook is overrated. I really don't understand why everyone is making such a big deal out of it. There's nothing wrong with MySpace. All my friends use MySpace. The profiles are easy to create. Facebook doesn't allow much room for creativity.
  reply
• 

  heri

  2 years ago

  i am somehow irritated by facebook's mail messages. but actually, i found out it's a design choice, possibly made by the facebook founders from launch. by forcing you to go there, you actually find yourself checking your news feed and then see your friends profile or whatever new app they have. you can see by the way that they make it easy for you to leave a message, they don't nag you with repeat screens and messages, no there is a nice ajax box which will instantly send the notification to your friend ... then the circle begins again.
  reply
• 

  RyanRFD

  2 years ago

  The interesting thing about Facebook is that it has added a layer of permanent personal identity to the Internet by forcing users to use their real identity. More impressively, they've created an environment where people are comfortable doing this.
  
  Now that they've opened up the F8 platform developers have access to a ready made collection of user identities and relationships unlike anything that has really existed before. So far we haven't seen anyone do anything really interesting with this identity layer, but it's only been a month.
  
  MOST people don't want to create and maintain a blog, but with Facebook they are getting many of the benefits that have a centralized identity allow with the added privacy that the 'walled garden' provides. As Esther Dyson says in the article you linked to, we are creating our own walled gardens.
  reply
• 

  Joseph Thornley

  2 years ago

  Mathew,
  As I try to understand the relationship between Facebook and blogging, I come to the realization that SIMPLICITY is the operational factor.
  
  Blogging made authorship simple.
  
  Facebook makes connecting with friends simple.
  
  They complement one another - until the next great development: the open platform that brings the ease of associating with the people you want to OUTSIDE of the closed community.
  
  Just like Compuserve a generation ago...
  reply
• 

  RyanRFD

  2 years ago

  Joseph,
  
  OpenID has that potential, but there are a lot of roadblocks in it's way currently.
  reply
• 

  Rob Hyndman

  2 years ago

  I saw that post by Paul - good point - but I think it begs the real question, which is not what the value of the Facebook audience is to the platform developers, but what is the value to Facebook? Paul's argument is that this is a here-today, gone-tomorrow crowd. Well, where will they be when the next new new thing comes along? Just how flighty is the audience? I've made this point tiresomely often with respect to Digg. Frankly, I think the jury's still very much out on this question, in much of the social media world.
  reply