<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Should journalists be human beings?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mathewingram.disqus.com/should_journalists_be_human_beings/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:53:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Should journalists be human beings?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/05/should-journalists-be-human-beings/#comment-1293469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hear, hear Dominic.  Well said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mathew&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should journalists be human beings?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/05/should-journalists-be-human-beings/#comment-1293467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll take a journalist with an opinion, a point of view, a mission and a passion any day over a unmotivated hack who rewrites news releases and simply repeats what each side of an argument says without question.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominic Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:51:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should journalists be human beings?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/05/should-journalists-be-human-beings/#comment-1293465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What, journalists are humans? Is this new?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Stuart&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should journalists be human beings?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/05/should-journalists-be-human-beings/#comment-1293463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good points, Brian -- thanks for the comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mathew&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should journalists be human beings?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/05/should-journalists-be-human-beings/#comment-1293471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course you should have opinions.  However .. from the point of view of a consumer not  a producer of news it's not the public who holds journalists to standards of impossible objectivity but you guys.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is - y'all say "we're objective and repot only the facts" and news consumers are like all 'ya right" and you guys are like "no really" and we're like "okay what-E-ver but what about this and that clear example of bias" and round and round it goes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're _all_ victims of a glass society where information propagates at light speed and nothing is going to remain hidden.  This time it's John Green next time it might be someone finding an obscure post I made to a listserv back in the day.  Not that I am anyone of note (aside from my job with an odd company) but still.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:36:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>