<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in SEC says blogs = proper disclosure</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:39:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SEC says blogs = proper disclosure</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/31/sec-says-blogs-proper-disclosure/#comment-1066392</link><description>That's a good point, Eric -- although most companies do all that with&lt;br&gt;their blogs already anyway.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:39:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEC says blogs = proper disclosure</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/31/sec-says-blogs-proper-disclosure/#comment-1065870</link><description>Death of transparency and conversation, because this makes a blog an official channel of communication which must be vetted and include the disclaimers that we see on press releases. Way to go Schwartz. Heh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>