<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Rolling Stone: old magazine, new ambitions</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:56:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rolling Stone: old magazine, new ambitions</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/13/rolling-stone-old-magazine-new-ambitions/#comment-1313640</link><description>i think this idea has a lot of potential. music is such an evocative medium that evokes a huge amount of passion - precisely what you need in a community. rolling stone may indeed be old, bloated, out of touch and any other of the accusations thrown at it but it does have some pulling power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;whether they can translate this power into value added content, such as exclusive live performances, that they can build a community around remains to be seen.  who knows, we may see a partnership with lastfm...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ed</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rolling Stone: old magazine, new ambitions</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/13/rolling-stone-old-magazine-new-ambitions/#comment-1313639</link><description>Good one, Amy  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:10:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rolling Stone: old magazine, new ambitions</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/13/rolling-stone-old-magazine-new-ambitions/#comment-1313638</link><description>Good idea: stick a pitchfork in it and see if it's done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amyloo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:05:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>