<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:34:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316882</link><description>PS Much of the 'hate-a-thon' (really, can we leave such phrases on the cutting room floor) was somewhat inspired my Arrington's own pugnaciousness in responding to people. My heart does not bleed for him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shelley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:34:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316885</link><description>The question I asked is, if Arrington was being comped for airline tickets and hotel room, were the tickets bought and sent to him, and room booked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they were, then Michael should apologize to the organizer. Pretending that this was lost in the shuffle doesn't quite wash when you have people making travel arrangements, or sending tickets. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If tickets were not purchased, travel arrangements not made, hotels not booked, then obviously this wasn't a real commitment, and yes, people should lay off. Additionally, the conference organizer should, next time, hire someone more capable of managing speaker confirmations and travel arrangements.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shelley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:32:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316881</link><description>Fair enough, Andy. I just think you were awfully quick to accuse Mike of doing all this for links without having a whole lot of evidence.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316880</link><description>Mark -- that's the blogosphere, man. ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Luckily, in this case, the questions *did* get answered fairly quick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony Hung</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316884</link><description>Honestly I feel I did a lot of research before writing my piece, and Mike has used controversy to build up traffic in the past.&lt;br&gt;I still need to link through to Rick's post, but then that contradicts what Mike has written in many ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I linked through to all my research sources, and the links represented both sides of the discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The conclusions I made were my personal opinion based on the information available.I was really looking forward to the New Media Fundraising presentation, albeit from a writeup from a 3rd party, but that has yet to materialize.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike himself is a proponent of link early, link often</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:49:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316883</link><description>A classic case of shooting first and asking questions later, if you ask me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:25:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316877</link><description>You're welcome, Rick. I think your post was an excellent lesson in how to take responsibility for something.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316879</link><description>Thanks for the post Mathew. My experience with Mike was similar even after this mini-controversy. He was friendly and really tried to work with us right up until the last minute. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TechCrunch is a wildly successful site and that makes it and Mike a huge target. I am the one to blame here and feel terrible about giving people the ammo to bash him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Calvert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:21:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Think before you blog</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/reminder-think-before-you-blog/#comment-1316878</link><description>Kudos Mathew! It is so much easier to "bash" than it is to think logically.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shama Hyder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:14:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>