<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Real vs. the MPAA: Dumb and dumberer</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:39:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Real vs. the MPAA: Dumb and dumberer</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/real-vs-the-mpaa-dumb-and-dumberer/#comment-2833773</link><description>The answer is obvious here. It really doesn't matter how good the DRM is that Real adds. They never had a right to have their hands on the media to begin with. The key here is that the copyright owner has rights. If Real had wanted to do a service like this, it could have sought to work with the studios. Instead it did the classic tech approach of "infringe now, litigate (and hopefully settle) later."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatrickRoss</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>