-
Website
http://www.mathewingram.com/work -
Original page
http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/11/real-life-experience-with-the-new-google-news/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
scrawledinwax
23 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
35 comments · 5 points
-
howardlindzon
46 comments · 69 points
-
JoeDuck
57 comments · 1 points
-
Karoli
32 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
3 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Are independent bloggers an endangered species?
2 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Bloggers, trust, MSM and correction fluid
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Why media outlets want Facebook Connect
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
First Read: Follow the Breadcrumbs : CJR
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
In defence of newspapers and serendipity
That's the equivalent of scraping, in my opinion. If newspapers' online bread and butter is page views and clicks, then it seems like it should be an obligation on Google/AP's part to link back to the original source.
Besides, it drives me crazy when I do a Google news search on a story happening in Santa Barbara, for example, and end up with the top result being an East Coast paper. It makes no sense whatsoever for me to link a blog post to an out-of-the-area secondary source.
Google should also put something in place on Google News so that the original source of a news story gets top billing rather than the most popular source.
In this particular case, was the story written by a local staff writer and then the AP "picked up" the original staff writer's story or did they write their AP version based on new research and all? If the AP just scraped the story from the news papper than I feel it is up to AP to properly credit the story and provide a link to the originating story. Of course I have no idea what the contracts say in regards to AP grabbing your content...
Glad we got the original source on the link, we try to do that when possible
And Drew, I agree -- I find it odd that AP is supposed to be a collective and yet it is clearly acting in its own interests and not those of its members.