<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mathew's comments - Latest Comments in Radiohead: Some numbers on In Rainbows</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:26:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Radiohead: Some numbers on In Rainbows</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/15/radiohead-some-numbers-on-in-rainbows/#comment-3074636</link><description>Thanks, Shane.  You're quite right about them not having a label, of course.  I appreciate you pointing that out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Radiohead: Some numbers on In Rainbows</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/15/radiohead-some-numbers-on-in-rainbows/#comment-3074349</link><description>Interesting stats but you're right that there needs to be more info.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Warner Chappell is Radiohead's publisher, not its record label. The band didn't have a label at the time of In Rainbows and licensed the CD release to various labels (XL in the UK, for example) on a one-time basis.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shane Richmond</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>