http://mathewingram.disqus.com/enWed, 30 Apr 2008 22:39:50 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/30/radiohead-no-more-free-stuff-for-you/#comment-399624Hey everyone, check out my Radiohead remix if you get a chance.<br><br>Radiohead - Nude (Minty Fresh Remix)<br><br><a href="http://radioheadremix.com./remix/?id=1527">http://radioheadremix.com./remix/?id=1527</a><br><br>Thanks!mintyfreshbeatsWed, 30 Apr 2008 22:39:50 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/30/radiohead-no-more-free-stuff-for-you/#comment-399576A fair point, Chris.mathewiWed, 30 Apr 2008 22:26:04 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/30/radiohead-no-more-free-stuff-for-you/#comment-399534NIN's recent experiment was more pay *if* you want, not pay *what* you want. The pay points were defined, it wasn't a blank box.ChrisWed, 30 Apr 2008 22:14:40 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/30/radiohead-no-more-free-stuff-for-you/#comment-398983I totally agree that it's not a sustainable model all by itself, David<br>-- but I think it could continue to be one part of the arsenal that an<br>artist could use, at least in a marketing sense. People love to get<br>things for free :-)mathewiWed, 30 Apr 2008 20:03:04 -0000http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/30/radiohead-no-more-free-stuff-for-you/#comment-398964hey mathew<br>'pay what you want' like most of these things is a one time stunt. it works for the group that does it first because its new and the press loves the new. its not sustainable and not a new model. unless of course your model is "free".david usherWed, 30 Apr 2008 19:59:34 -0000